|
DRD Supplementary Materials to ANSYS Dynamics Course |
|
Supplementary Material to Harmonic Analysis Chapter and Workshop |
|
| DRD has expanded the harmonic analysis of a fixed-fixed beam workshop to cover a variety of important concepts. The beam is shown in the figure below with two harmonic forces. | |
|
|
|
|
• We cover the general procedure for performing harmonic analysis using the full method. • We apply the two complex beam loads in phase, 90 degrees out of phase, and 180 degrees out of phase and investigate how any why the load phase angles excite certain modes and don't excite others. In other words, we learn how to define and interpret the effect of complex (real and imaginary) loads on harmonic response models. • We apply modal, alpha, and beta damping to the model, and we calculate manually the alpha and beta coefficients to achieve the desired levels of damping. • We cover the procedure for finding the model physical location, forcing frequency, and phase angle, which produce the maximum model displacement. The graphic below shows the harmonic response of the beam with the forces acting in phase near the first natural frequency of the beam. |
|
![]() |
|
| These graphs show frequency response plots at a variety of load phase angles and damping models. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Supplementary Material to the Response Spectrum Material in the ANSYS Spectrum Analysis Module
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Material to the Random Vibration PSD Spectrum Material in the ANSYS Spectrum Analysis Module |
|
|
DRD has created a workshop in which the students subject the electronic chassis shown in the figure below to the PSD spectrum shown on the right. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
In the random vibration
workshop we also show how to calculate the response PSD at the model base in
order to reproduce the input PSD. This is a standard model results check,
which DRD recommends. The graph on the lower left is the input PSD displayed
in the ANSYS preprocessor. The graph on the lower right is the input PSD
displayed in the ANSYS time-history postprocessor, and it was created by
calculating output PSD at the chassis base.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
We also cover how to calculate
output PSD at arbitrary locations on the model and then superimpose
the output PSD in the input PSD curve as shown in this graphic on the right. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Material to Mode Superposition Harmonic Response Portion of Dynamics Course |
|
|
In this workshop we apply a base
acceleration over a range of frequencies to the electronic chassis on the
right.
We use the mode superposition technique in combination with a large mass at the base to apply the base acceleration. The chassis is shown on the right.
|
|
|
The graph on the right shows the
chassis frequency response due to harmonic base acceleration.
|
![]() |
|
This workshop also provides
practice on finding the model location, forcing frequency and phase angle at
which the maximum model stress occurs. Finally we expand the mode
superposition solution to allow postprocessing of the model maximum
stresses.
We conclude this workshop
with a hand calculation to check the ANSYS model results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this workshop we apply a
shock due to an isosceles triangle acceleration versus time loading to the
electronic chassis.
We use the mode superposition technique to perform an efficient solution. The chassis is shown on the right.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The isosceles triangle acceleration versus time loading is shown on the left. |
|
|
![]() |
|
We also expand the time-history solution at a subset of the total available time history solution sets to enable time history animation of the model results as shown in this graphic below.
|
|
![]() |
|
|
We check the transient dynamic solution using the dynamic load factor approach. The dynamic load factor curve for an isosceles triangle load curve is shown on the right. Finally, we show how to adjust the dynamic load factor to account for a half sine loading instead of an isosceles triangle load versus time curve.
|
![]() |